Three Kinds or Grades of Phantasia in Aristotle’s De Anima
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1981-9471.v7i1p19-48Keywords:
Aristotle, soul, psychology, phantasia, imagination, phantasmataAbstract
Phantasia / imagination in Aristotle is one of the parts or faculties / powers of the soul that cannot exist apart from sensation and thought. The function of phantasia and its connection with phantasmata, the products of this faculty, plays a significant role in the psychological treatises of the Aristotelian Corpus. The purpose of this paper is to examine the concept of phantasia in Book III, Chapter 3 of De Anima, and to show that the Stagyrite philosopher distinguishes three and not two kinds of phantasia, starting from the lowest, which is found in imperfect creatures, to the highest, which appears only in the human beings.
Downloads
References
Alexander of Aphrodisias. Alexandri Aphrodisiensis Praeter Commentaria Scripta Minora. De Anima Liber Cum Mantissa. edited by I. Bruns. Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca, Supplementum Aristotelicum, Vol. II, Part 1, Berlin: G. Reimer, 1887.
Aquinas, Thomas St. 1946. The Commentary of St. Thomas Aquinas on Aristotle’s Treatise On the Soul. translated by R. A. Kocourek, St. Paul, Minnesota, College of St. Thomas.
Aquinas, Thomas St. Corpus Thomisticum. Sentencia Libri De Anima, Liber II, textum Taurini 1959 editum ac automato translatum a Roberto Busa SJ in taenias magneticas denuo recognovit Enrique Alarcón atque instruxit .
Aristotelis. 1962. Ethica Nicomachea. edited by I. Bywater, Oxford, Clarendon Press [1894].
Aristotle. . De Anima. Books II and III (with certain passages from Book I), translated, with an introduction and notes by David W. Hamlyn. Clarendon Aristotle Series, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Aristotle. 1908. The Nicomachean Ethics, translated by William D. Ross, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Aristotle. 1976. Aristotle’s Psychology, with introduction and notes by Edwin Wallace, New York: Arno Press.
Aristotle. 1976. De Anima, with translation, introduction and notes by Robert D. Hicks. New York: Arno Press [1907].
Aristotle. 1993. Aristotle’s De Anima in Focus. edited by Michael Durrant, London and New York: Routledge.
Aristotle. 1996. On Sleep and Dreams, a text and translation with introduction, notes and glossary by David Gallop. Warminster – England, Aris & Phillips Ltd.
Aristotle. De Anima, with introduction, translation and notes by Vasileios Tatakis, edited by E. Papanoutsos, Athens, «Daidalos» - I. Zaharopoulos [no date].
Aristotle. De Anima. II-III. text, translation and notes by Andreas Papatheodorou (in Greek), Athens, «Papyrus» Publications [no date].
Aristotle. Generation of Animals, with an English translation by A. L. Peck, Loeb Classical Library, 1942, London: W. Heinemann Ltd/Cambridge; Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1953.
Aristotle. Historia Animalium: In Three Volumes. Volume I: Books I-III, translated by A. L. Peck, Loeb Classical Library, 1965, London: W. Heinemann Ltd/Cambridge; Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1984.
Aristotle. Parts of Animals, translated by A. L. Peck. Movement of Animals. Progression of Animals, translated by E. S. Forster, Loeb Classical Library, 1937, London: W. Heinemann Ltd/Cambridge; Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1968.
Aristotle. Parva Naturalia; On Breath, translated by W. S. Hett, Loeb Classical Library, 1936, London, W. Heinemann Ltd/Cambridge, Massachusetts, Harvard University Press, 1975.
Aristotle. The Athenian Constitution. The Eudemian Ethics. On Virtues and Vices, translated by H. Rackham, Loeb Classical Library, 1935, London, W. Heinemann Ltd/Cambridge; Massachusetts, Harvard University Press, 1961.
Aristotle. The Metaphysics. Books I-IX, translated by H. Tredennick, Loeb Classical Library, 1933, London: W. Heinemann Ltd/Cambridge; Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1961.
Caston, Victor. 1996. ‘Why Aristotle Needs Imagination’. Phronesis 41, Number 1: 20-55. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/156852896321051774
Castoriadis, Cornelius. 1998. The Imaginary Institution of Society. Translated by Kathleen Blarney, Cambridge, MIT Press [1975].
Caujolle-Zaslawsky, Françoise. 1996. ‘L'Emploi d’Hupolèpsis dans le De Anima, III, 3’. Sous la direction de Gilbert Romeyer-Dherbey, études réunies par Cristina Viano, Corps et Âme: Sur le De Anima d’ Aristote, Paris: J. Vrin.
Engmann, Joyce. 1976. ‘Imagination and Truth in Aristotle’. Journal of the History of Philosophy 14: 259-65. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/hph.2008.0189
Forbes, William T. M. 1930. ‘The Silkworm of Aristotle’. Classical Philology, 25, 1, jan: 22-26. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/361193
Frede, Dorothea. 1996. ‘The Cognitive Role of Phantasia in Aristotle’, in M. C. Nussbaum and A. O. Rorty (eds.), Essays on Aristotle’s De Anima, Oxford: Clarendon Press, (19921): 279-295. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/019823600X.003.0016.
Freudenthal, Jakob, 1863. Ueber den Begriff des Wortes Φαντασία bei Aristoteles. Göttingen.
Honderich, Ted (ed.). 1995. The Oxford Companion to Philosophy. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.
Ierodiakonou, Charalambos S. 2004. Psychological Issues in the Writings of Aristotle (in Greek), Thessaloniki: Mastorides.
Kosslyn, S. M.; T. M. Ball; B. J. Reiser,. 1978. ‘Visual Images Preserve Metric Spatial Information: Evidence from Studies of Image Scanning’, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 4: 47-60. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.4.1.47.
Modrak, Deborah K. W. 1986. ‘Phantasia Reconsidered’, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 66: 47-69. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/agph.1986.68.1.47.
Ned J. Block 1981. Imagery. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Nussbaum, Martha C. 1978. ‘The Role of Phantasia in Aristotle’s Explanation of Action’, in Aristotle’s De Motu Animalium: Text with Translation, Commentary, and Interpretative Essays by Martha C. Nussbaum, Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press: 221-269.
Oehler, Klaus. 1962. Die Lehre vom Noetischen und Dianoetischen Denken bei Platon und Aristoteles: Ein Beitrag zur Erforschung der Geschichte des Bewussteinsproblems in der Antike. München: Zetemata, Heft 29, C. H. Beck.
Papachristou, Christina S. 2006. ‘The Mental Images (Phantasmata) in Aristotle’s De Anima and in S. Kosslyn’s Contemporary Work’ (in Greek). In: Demetra Sfendoni-Mentzou (ed.). The Aristotelian Philosophy and the Contemporary Scientific Thought, Thessaloniki: Aristotle University of Thessaloniki: 112-134.
Papachristou, Christina S. 2008. ‘The Puzzling Role of the Brain in Aristotle’s Theory of Sense Perception’. herausgeber von Jochen Althoff, Sabine Föllinger, Georg Wöhrle, Antike.
Papachristou, Christina S. 2008. The Cognitive Process in the Aristotelian Philosophy: Aἴσθησις (Sense), Αἴσθημα (Sensation), Φαντασία (Phantasia), Φάντασμα (Phantasma), Μνήμη (Memory), Μνημόνευμα (Mnemonic Image), Νοῦς (Mind), Νόημα (Noêma), Ph.D. Thesis (in Greek), Thessaloniki, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki.
Papachristou, Christina S. 2009. ‘The Influence of the Aristotelian Theory of Phantasia in the Stoic Philosophy and in the Scientific Work of George J. Romanes’ (in Greek). in: Anastasios Stephos; Spiros Touliatos (eds.). Seminar 36: Aristotle: Leading Teacher and Thinker, Athens: Ellinoekdotiki, Panhellenic Association of Philologist: 72-89.
Philoponus, Ioannes. 1897. Ioannis Philoponi in Aristotelis de Anima Libros Commentaria, edited by Michael Hayduck. Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca, Vol. XV, Berlin: G. Reimer.
Plato. Theaetetus. Sophist. Vol. VII, translated by H. N. Fowler, Loeb Classical Library, 1921, London: W. Heinemann Ltd/Cambridge; Massachusetts; Harvard University Press, 1968.
Polansky, Ronald (ed.). 2007. Aristotle’s De Anima: A Critical Commentary, Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.
Pylyshyn, Zenon W. 1981.‘The Imagery Debate: Analogue Media versus Tacit Knowledge’. Psychological Review, 88: pp. 16-45. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.88.1.16.
Rees, David A. 1971. ‘Aristotle’s Treatment of Φαντασία’. in J. P. Anton and G. L. Kustas (eds.), Essays in Ancient Greek Philosophy. Albany, New York: State University of New York Press: 491-504.
Ross, David Sir. 1995. Aristotle, with a new introduction by John L. Ackrill. New York, Routledge, (19231).
Schofield, Malcolm. 1978. ‘Aristotle on Imagination’. In: G. E. R. Lloyd and G. E. L. Owen (eds.). Aristotle on Mind and the Senses: Proceedings of the Seventh Symposium Aristotelicum, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (1975).
Simplicius. 1882. In Libros Aristotelis de Anima Commentaria. edited by M. Hayduck. Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca, Vol. XI, Berlin: G. Reimer,.
Sophonias. 1883. In Libros Aristotelis de Anima Paraphrasis. edited by M. Hayduck. Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca, Vol. XXIII, Part 1, Berlin: G. Reimer.
Themistius. 1899. In Libros Aristotelis de Anima Paraphrasis. edited by R. Heinze. Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca, Vol. V, Part 3, Berlin: G. Reimer,.
Thomas, Nigel J.T. 2013. ‘Aristotle's Influence’. Supplement to ‘Mental Imagery’, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2013 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = <http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/mental-imagery/aristotle-influence. html>.
Turnbull, Kenneth. 1999. ‘De Anima III 3*’. in L. P. Gerson (ed.), Aristotle: Critical Assessments, Vol. I: Psychology and Ethics. London and New York: Routledge: 83-120.
Wedin, Michael V. 1988. Mind and Imagination in Aristotle. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
White, Kevin 1985. ‘The Meaning of Phantasia in Aristotle’s De Anima, III, 3-8’. Dialogue 24: 483-505. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0012217300040348.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC By 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
